Connecticut field hockey coaches poll (2006)
2006 state finals
Sat. Nov. 18 at Wethersfield High
Class L: Greenwich 5, Simsbury 2
Class M: Wilton 2, Hand 0
Class S: North Branford 1, HK 0, OT
Team
Rec. Pts. LW
1. Greenwich (5) 20-2 1004
2. Wilton 19-1-1 861
3. Hand 18-1-0-1 723
4. North Branford 15-4-1 70nr
5. Simsbury 16-1 682
6. H-Killingworth 17-3 546
7. Pomperaug16-3 419
8. Darien 16-5 385
9. Lewis Mills17-1-1 288
10. Glastonbury 14-2-3 2112
Also receiving votes: Canton (13-3-2-1) and Cheshire (10-5-2-1).
Week 6, Oct. 31
Team Rec. Pts. LW
1. Wilton (7) 15-0-1 158 3
2. Simsbury (1) 13-0 132 2
3. Hand 14-0-0-1 130 1
4. Greenwich 16-2 118 4
5. Darien 14-4 75 9
6. H-Killingworth 12-1 65 6
7. McMahon 11-3 64 7
8. Lewis Mills14-0-1 63 8
9. Pomperaug14-2 58 9
10. Hall 12-1-249 nr
Also receiving votes: Branford (11-2-1-1) 22, Glastonbury (11-1-3) 12, New Milford (13-2) 8, Canton (11-1-2-1) 6
Week 5, Oct. 24
Team Rec. Pts. LW
1. Hand (5) 11-0-0-1 136 1
2. Simsbury (1) 13-0 1183
3. Wilton (1)13-0-1 1142
5. Glastonbury 10-1-2 795
6. H-Killingworth 12-1 629
8. Lewis Mills 11-0-1 4812
Also receiving votes: New Milford (12-2) 24, Canton (9-1-2) 23, Branford (9-2-1-1) 12
Week 4, Oct. 17
Team Rec. Pts. LW
2. Wilton 10-0-1 1383
5. Glastonbury 10-0-2 738
6. Greenwich 10-2 686
7. New Milford 9-1 629
9. H-Killingworth 12-1 594
Also receiving votes: Hall (8-1-2) 37, Lewis Mills (10-0-1) 14, Branford (8-2-1) 12
Week 3, Oct. 10
Team Rec. Pts. LW
1. Hand (5) 8-0 134 1
2. McMahon (2) 8-0 130 2
3. Wilton 8-0-1 100 3
4. H-Killngwrth 10-1 944
5. Darien 10-2 796
6. Greenwich 8-2-1 65 10
7. Simsbury 7-062 7
8. Glastonbury 9-0-1 58 7
Also receiving votes: Pomperaug (8-2) 26, Hall (7-0-1) 13, Branford (7-2)
Week 2, Oct. 3
Team Rec. Pts. LW
1. Hand (4) 6-0 130 1
2. McMahon (2) 7-0 126 11
3. Wilton 6-0 106 nr
4. H-Killngwrth (1) 7-0903
7. Glastonbury 7-0-1 495
7. Simsbury 6-049 14
Also receiving votes: Mercy-Middletown (5-1-1) 2, Hall (6-0-1) 2, Pomperaug (6-1) 2
Week 1, Sept. 26
Team Rec. Pts. Last Yr
1. Hand (4) 4-0 148 3
2. Darien (1) 6-0 124 11
3. H-K (1) 5-0 97 4
4. Wilton (2) 4-086 9
5. Glastonbury5-0 82 12
6. New Milford4-079 14
7. Greenwich 3-177 1
8. Canton 4-0 67 nr
9. Hall 4-048 nr
10. Pomperaug 4-143 6
Also receiving votes: Brien McMahon-Norwalk (4-0) 35, Lewis Mills (4-0-1) 20, Guilford (3-1) 18, Simsbury (3-0) 15, Branford (3-2) 1, Wamogo (3-0-2) 1, Mercy (5-0) 1
Connecticut field hockey coaches poll (2005)
2005 state finals
Sat. Nov. 19 at Wethersfield High
Class L: Greenwich 1, Cheshire 0
Class M: Branford 1, Hand 0
Class S: Lewis Mills 1, Haddam-Killingworth 1, 2 OT
Week 8, FINAL
Team Rec Votes LW
1. Greenwich (8) 21-1-0 160 1
2. Pomperaug 19-1-0 144 2
3. Hand 15-2-0-2 118 4
4. H-Killingworth 15-2-2 104 13
5. Lewis Mills 15-1-3-1 92 10
6. Pomperaug 17-2-0 82 2
7. Cheshire 13-5-1-1 77 nr
8. Granby 15-3-1 55 7
9. Wilton 12-3-2 52 14
10. Simsbury 12-2-2 50 9
n Also receiving votes: Darien 10-2-2-2, Glastonbury 14-1-2-1, Nonnewaug 14-3-1, New Milford 12-3-1
n Of note: Marlotte VanDenBergh scored with 11:19 left in the second half to lift Greenwich to its first state title since 1998. ... Branford won a state record 10th state title as sweeper Kirsten Auer scored off a penalty corner with 7:47 left in the first half. ... Goalie Sarah Beattie had 8 saves as Mills won a piece of its first-ever championship by tying H-K.
Week 7, Nov. 8
Team Rec Votes LW
1. Greenwich (6) 15-1-0 120 1
2. Pomperaug 16-1-0 104 2
3. Branford 16-1-0 98 3
4. Hand 14-2-0-1 82 4
5. Glastonbury 13-0-2-1 60 5
6. Nonnewaug 14-2-1 53 6
7. Granby 14-2-1 46 8
8. New Milford 11-2-1 40 9
9. Simsbury 10-1-2 36 10
10. Lewis Mills 13-1-2-1 29 12
n Also receiving votes: Avon 11-2-2-1, Darien 10-1-2-2, Haddam-Killingworth 13-2-1, Wilton 11-2-2
Week 6, Nov. 1
Team Rec Votes LW
1. Greenwich (9) 15-1-0 180 1
2. Pomperaug 15-1-0 154 2
3. Branford 13-1-0 144 3
4. Hand 12-2-0-1 120 4
5. Glastonbury 12-0-2-1 94 6
6. Nonnewaug 12-2-1 86 5
7. Darien 10-1-2-3 63 7
8. Granby 11-2-1 56 9
9. New Milford 11-2-1 38 15
10. Simsbury 10-1-1 37 8
n Also receiving votes: Avon 9-1-2-1, Stonington 9-1-3, Lewis Mills 11-1-2-1, Wilton 12-2-1
Week 5, Oct. 25
Team Rec Votes LW
1. Greenwich (8) 13-1-0 160 1
2. Pomperaug 13-1-0 136 3
3. Branford 10-1-0 122 4
4. Hand 9-2-0-1 120 2
5. Nonnewaug 11-1-1 71 8
6. Glastonbury 10-0-2-1 68 6
7. Darien 8-1-2-2 63 5
8. Simsbury 8-0-1 53 11
9. Granby 9-2-0 48 nr
10. Avon 6-1-1-1 29 10
n Also receiving votes: Stonington 8-1, Lewis Mills 7-1-2-1, Enfield 9-2, Conard 8-2-1, New Milford 10-1-1, Cheshire 9-2-0-1
Week 4, Oct. 18
Team Rec Votes LW
1. Greenwich (7) 10-1-0-1 176 3
2. Hand 9-0-0-1 154 2
3. Pomperaug 12-1-0 148 1
4. Branford (1) 6-1-0 120 4
5. Darien 7-1-1-1 82 5
6. Glastonbury 10-0-1-1 81 6
7. Conard 7-2-0 66 11
8. Nonnewaug 9-1-1 61 9
9. Lewis Mills 6-1-2-1 47 7
10. Avon 4-1-1-1 36 8
n Also receiving votes: Simsbury 6-0-1
Week 3, Oct. 11
Team Rec Votes LW
1. Pomperaug (7) 10-1-0 140 1
2. Hand 8-0-0-1 120 2
3. Greenwich 8-1-0 112 3
4. Branford (1) 6-1-0 93 4
5. Darien 6-1-0-1 77 5
6. Glastonbury (1) 8-0-0-1 74 6
7. Lewis Mills 5-0-2-1 52 8
8. Avon 4-0-1-1 37 7
9. Nonnewaug 7-1-1 35 10
10. Westhill 7-0-2 29 9
n Also receiving votes: Conard 7-0, Granby 6-2, Cheshire 5-2-0-1, McMahon-Norwalk 4-1-2
Week 2, Oct. 4
Team Rec Votes LW
1. Pomperaug (6) 7-0-0 134 1
2. Hand 7-0-0-1 112 2
3. Greenwich 5-1-0 105 3
4. Branford (1) 6-1-0 100 5
5. Darien 5-1-0-1 69 6
6. Glastonbury 6-0-0-1 59 7
7. Avon 3-0-1-1 44 4
8. Lewis Mills 5-0-0-1 36 14
9. Westhill 5-0-2 34 15
10. Nonnewaug 6-1-0 25 8
n Also receiving votes: Conard 5-0, Granby 4-2, Guilford 3-1, McMahon 3-1-1.
Week 1, Sept. 27
Team Rec Votes LYr
1. Pomperaug (5) 4-0-0 160 10
2. Hand 5-0-0-1 132 7
3. Greenwich (2) 3-1-0 118 4
4. Avon (2) 3-0-1-1 114 12
5. Branford 4-1-0 110 t2
6. Darien 3-1-0 70 5
7. Glastonbury 5-0-0-1 69 nr
8. Nonnewaug 5-1-0 65 nr
9. Wamogo 3-1-1 38 nr
10. Enfield 3-2-0 37 nr
n Also receiving votes: Guilford 3-1, Brookfield 4-1-0-1, Brien McMahon, Lewis Mills 4-0-0-1, Westhill 5-0
n Of note: Avon lost to Enfield 1-0 in OT in the season opener but beat Canton in OT on a goal with 11 seconds left in the game. ...
